https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124109 The Tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application and dismissed the Appeal along with the Stay application. The Applicant's belief that duty had been deposited, leading to the delay in filing the appeal, was not considered a sufficient cause. The Tribunal found that the Applicant had not taken reasonable steps and lacked evidence to support their claim. The decision was based on the interpretation of "sufficient cause" as per the relevant law. en-us Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:32:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124109 The Tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application and dismissed the Appeal along with the Stay application. The Applicant's belief that duty had been deposited, leading to the delay in filing the appeal, was not considered a sufficient cause. The Tribunal found that the Applicant had not taken reasonable steps and lacked evidence to support their claim. The decision was based on the interpretation of "sufficient cause" as per the relevant law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124109