<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 577 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124103</link>
    <description>Withdrawal of deferred duty payment facility without notice or an opportunity of hearing violated natural justice and could not be sustained. The corrigendum that materially enhanced the penalty without recorded reasons was also impermissible, as it could not validly alter the original adjudication and had not been noticed by the appellate authority. The record further showed that duty liability had been discharged by debit in the Cenvat account, which was treated as payment of duty under excise law. On these grounds, the impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:31:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 577 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124103</link>
      <description>Withdrawal of deferred duty payment facility without notice or an opportunity of hearing violated natural justice and could not be sustained. The corrigendum that materially enhanced the penalty without recorded reasons was also impermissible, as it could not validly alter the original adjudication and had not been noticed by the appellate authority. The record further showed that duty liability had been discharged by debit in the Cenvat account, which was treated as payment of duty under excise law. On these grounds, the impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>