https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124099 The restoration applications for an appeal dismissed in default were rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, presided over by Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Shri B.S.V. Murthy. The Tribunal emphasized that the rejection of the adjournment request and subsequent decision on the merits distinguished this case from appeal dismissals in default. It was underscored that the detailed consideration of the case's merits in a 14-page order rendered the absence of the appellants during the order's passing insufficient grounds for recall. The appellants were reminded of their right to challenge the decision before a higher appellate forum if dissatisfied. en-us Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:17:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124099 The restoration applications for an appeal dismissed in default were rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, presided over by Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Shri B.S.V. Murthy. The Tribunal emphasized that the rejection of the adjournment request and subsequent decision on the merits distinguished this case from appeal dismissals in default. It was underscored that the detailed consideration of the case's merits in a 14-page order rendered the absence of the appellants during the order's passing insufficient grounds for recall. The appellants were reminded of their right to challenge the decision before a higher appellate forum if dissatisfied. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124099