https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124084 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside the findings of clandestine removal based on the recovery of Kachcha slips alone. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence to support the allegations and rejected the Revenue's appeal, extending the benefit of doubt to the respondent due to insufficient proof of clandestine removal. en-us Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:20:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124084 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside the findings of clandestine removal based on the recovery of Kachcha slips alone. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence to support the allegations and rejected the Revenue's appeal, extending the benefit of doubt to the respondent due to insufficient proof of clandestine removal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124084