<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 525 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124080</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, AHMEDABAD held that credit notes are not valid documents for availing Modvat credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellant for irregularly availing credit based on credit notes. Despite reducing the penalty due to lack of mala fide intention, the appeal was rejected as the appellant did not await final assessment before claiming credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 525 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124080</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, AHMEDABAD held that credit notes are not valid documents for availing Modvat credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellant for irregularly availing credit based on credit notes. Despite reducing the penalty due to lack of mala fide intention, the appeal was rejected as the appellant did not await final assessment before claiming credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>