<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 592 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124053</link>
    <description>The appeal involved the import of brass scrap mixed with war material/explosive material. The court set aside the penalty imposed on the importer, citing no malafide intent. However, the order for absolute confiscation of the explosive material was upheld. The court justified the confiscation of the entire consignment but reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 40,000. The judgment partially allowed the appeal based on the considerations outlined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:28:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 592 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124053</link>
      <description>The appeal involved the import of brass scrap mixed with war material/explosive material. The court set aside the penalty imposed on the importer, citing no malafide intent. However, the order for absolute confiscation of the explosive material was upheld. The court justified the confiscation of the entire consignment but reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 40,000. The judgment partially allowed the appeal based on the considerations outlined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>