https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124047 The Tribunal denied the stay application for demand duty amounting to Rs. 19,89,814.00, as the Appellant failed to produce original documents and relied on a Xerox copy of the Bill of Entry, which was deemed inadmissible. Despite claims of Modvat credit relief and financial hardship, the Appellant's failure to substantiate their plea with genuine evidence led to the rejection of the stay. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with legal obligations and ordered the Appellant to deposit the full demand amount within four weeks, citing lack of substantive reason to support the stay application. en-us Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:45:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124047 The Tribunal denied the stay application for demand duty amounting to Rs. 19,89,814.00, as the Appellant failed to produce original documents and relied on a Xerox copy of the Bill of Entry, which was deemed inadmissible. Despite claims of Modvat credit relief and financial hardship, the Appellant's failure to substantiate their plea with genuine evidence led to the rejection of the stay. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with legal obligations and ordered the Appellant to deposit the full demand amount within four weeks, citing lack of substantive reason to support the stay application. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124047