https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124043 The appeal was deemed maintainable as it was filed within the prescribed three-month period from authorization receipt, despite the review order exceeding the one-year limit. The Tribunal clarified its lack of jurisdiction to rule on the review order's validity. The miscellaneous applications were disposed of, with the order for personal appearance being recalled. en-us Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124043 The appeal was deemed maintainable as it was filed within the prescribed three-month period from authorization receipt, despite the review order exceeding the one-year limit. The Tribunal clarified its lack of jurisdiction to rule on the review order's validity. The miscellaneous applications were disposed of, with the order for personal appearance being recalled. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124043