https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124042 The Tribunal directed M/s. SIPL to deposit Rs. 15 crores within eight weeks, granting waiver for the remaining duty amount and penalties. Duty liability was affirmed on M/s. SIPL, rejecting jurisdiction arguments. Re-warehousing certificates were found valid, denying the plea of unauthorized signatures. Cross-examination refusal was deemed justified. Financial hardship claims were dismissed. Directors were held liable for penalties, and corporate bodies were directed to pre-deposit penalties. en-us Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:22:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124042 The Tribunal directed M/s. SIPL to deposit Rs. 15 crores within eight weeks, granting waiver for the remaining duty amount and penalties. Duty liability was affirmed on M/s. SIPL, rejecting jurisdiction arguments. Re-warehousing certificates were found valid, denying the plea of unauthorized signatures. Cross-examination refusal was deemed justified. Financial hardship claims were dismissed. Directors were held liable for penalties, and corporate bodies were directed to pre-deposit penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124042