<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 665 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124019</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders denying the refund claim and remanding the matter for a fresh decision. It held that the communication letters directing credit reversal were not appealable orders, and the appellants were not at fault for not appealing against them. The Tribunal stressed the need for clear and appealable orders in matters of duty remission and refund claims to prevent procedural disadvantages for taxpayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:58:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 665 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124019</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders denying the refund claim and remanding the matter for a fresh decision. It held that the communication letters directing credit reversal were not appealable orders, and the appellants were not at fault for not appealing against them. The Tribunal stressed the need for clear and appealable orders in matters of duty remission and refund claims to prevent procedural disadvantages for taxpayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>