https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124007 For stay purposes, the Revenue was held to have made a prima facie case that imported goods were brought otherwise than through a designated port under Notification No. 99/2001. The interim analysis accepted the Revenue's contention that the notification restricted import to designated ports, rendering the impugned order vulnerable at the stage of stay. Consequential relief was kept in abeyance during the pendency of the appeal, and operation of the impugned order was stayed. en-us Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:43:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124007 For stay purposes, the Revenue was held to have made a prima facie case that imported goods were brought otherwise than through a designated port under Notification No. 99/2001. The interim analysis accepted the Revenue's contention that the notification restricted import to designated ports, rendering the impugned order vulnerable at the stage of stay. Consequential relief was kept in abeyance during the pendency of the appeal, and operation of the impugned order was stayed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124007