https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124003 An appeal and stay application that had been treated as abated under Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules because of a company's winding-up order were restored after the winding-up order was recalled. The recall followed the company's clearance of its creditors' dues, removing the basis on which abatement had been recorded. Once that foundation ceased to exist, the earlier dismissal could not be sustained, and the proceedings were reinstated to their original numbers. en-us Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124003 An appeal and stay application that had been treated as abated under Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules because of a company's winding-up order were restored after the winding-up order was recalled. The recall followed the company's clearance of its creditors' dues, removing the basis on which abatement had been recorded. Once that foundation ceased to exist, the earlier dismissal could not be sustained, and the proceedings were reinstated to their original numbers. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124003