https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123989 The Tribunal directed the authority to refund Rs. 63,905 to the appellant within a week, emphasizing that the Assistant Commissioner was not authorized to appropriate the deposited amount against the duty demand. The decision aimed to rectify the improper appropriation, ensuring the appellant's rights were safeguarded and compliance with the directives concerning pre-deposit and stay of recovery was maintained. en-us Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123989 The Tribunal directed the authority to refund Rs. 63,905 to the appellant within a week, emphasizing that the Assistant Commissioner was not authorized to appropriate the deposited amount against the duty demand. The decision aimed to rectify the improper appropriation, ensuring the appellant's rights were safeguarded and compliance with the directives concerning pre-deposit and stay of recovery was maintained. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123989