<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 602 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123987</link>
    <description>Where a business is transferred as a going concern with assets and liabilities passing to the transferee, the original owner ceases to have a subsisting interest in the undertaking and cannot be treated as a person aggrieved by a later order relating to that business. On that basis, the appellant lacked locus standi to maintain the appeal, and the proceedings were dismissed at the threshold for want of maintainability after the transfer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 602 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123987</link>
      <description>Where a business is transferred as a going concern with assets and liabilities passing to the transferee, the original owner ceases to have a subsisting interest in the undertaking and cannot be treated as a person aggrieved by a later order relating to that business. On that basis, the appellant lacked locus standi to maintain the appeal, and the proceedings were dismissed at the threshold for want of maintainability after the transfer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>