<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 437 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123976</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the pharmaceutical goods manufacturer regarding duty liability on Physician Samples sold to brand owners. It differentiated between providing samples for free and selling them, concluding that the High Court judgment and Board&#039;s circular did not directly apply in the latter scenario. The manufacturer was granted relief with a waiver of duty, interest, and penalty, and the Tribunal ordered the suspension of dues recovery pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:40:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 437 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123976</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the pharmaceutical goods manufacturer regarding duty liability on Physician Samples sold to brand owners. It differentiated between providing samples for free and selling them, concluding that the High Court judgment and Board&#039;s circular did not directly apply in the latter scenario. The manufacturer was granted relief with a waiver of duty, interest, and penalty, and the Tribunal ordered the suspension of dues recovery pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>