https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123967 The Tribunal ruled in the case concerning Cenvat credit eligibility for inputs used in manufacturing both dutiable and exempted products. The applicant's argument based on Rule 2(k) was considered, but the Tribunal emphasized the need for separate records for different product categories. While acknowledging the applicant's position, the Tribunal highlighted the significance of Rules 3 and 6, concluding that a complete waiver of duty was not warranted. The Tribunal directed the applicant to make a specified deposit within a set timeframe, with further compliance obligations. Pre-deposit for remaining amounts was waived pending appeal, aiming to balance interests and ensure legal compliance. en-us Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:41:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123967 The Tribunal ruled in the case concerning Cenvat credit eligibility for inputs used in manufacturing both dutiable and exempted products. The applicant's argument based on Rule 2(k) was considered, but the Tribunal emphasized the need for separate records for different product categories. While acknowledging the applicant's position, the Tribunal highlighted the significance of Rules 3 and 6, concluding that a complete waiver of duty was not warranted. The Tribunal directed the applicant to make a specified deposit within a set timeframe, with further compliance obligations. Pre-deposit for remaining amounts was waived pending appeal, aiming to balance interests and ensure legal compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123967