<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 424 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123963</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of imported goods, finding that the goods were correctly described and not subject to misdeclaration. The Tribunal also held that there was a prima facie case against the confiscation of goods, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for all dues. The penalty imposed by the Commissioner was dismissed, and the appellants were granted relief based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:25:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 424 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123963</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of imported goods, finding that the goods were correctly described and not subject to misdeclaration. The Tribunal also held that there was a prima facie case against the confiscation of goods, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for all dues. The penalty imposed by the Commissioner was dismissed, and the appellants were granted relief based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>