<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 417 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123956</link>
    <description>Where the Tribunal has extended stay till disposal of the appeal, the Department cannot insist on recovery of the disputed duty demand during the subsistence of that stay. The Tribunal clarified that a stay extended until final disposal is not a limited-period protection, and any doubt about its effect should be addressed by seeking clarification or modification from the Tribunal. The Department was therefore directed not to press payment of the duty demand covered by the appeal while the stay remained in force.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 09:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 417 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123956</link>
      <description>Where the Tribunal has extended stay till disposal of the appeal, the Department cannot insist on recovery of the disputed duty demand during the subsistence of that stay. The Tribunal clarified that a stay extended until final disposal is not a limited-period protection, and any doubt about its effect should be addressed by seeking clarification or modification from the Tribunal. The Department was therefore directed not to press payment of the duty demand covered by the appeal while the stay remained in force.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>