<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 571 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld duty and interest but directed recalculation of duty liability after deducting scrap value included twice. Penalty was set aside due to genuine misunderstanding, emphasizing fair interpretation of duty obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 09:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 571 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld duty and interest but directed recalculation of duty liability after deducting scrap value included twice. Penalty was set aside due to genuine misunderstanding, emphasizing fair interpretation of duty obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>