<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 570 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123949</link>
    <description>The Tribunal clarified that the appellant must pay a reduced fine of Rs. 8,00,000/- and a penalty of Rs. 2,00,000/- for violating import policy, despite successfully appealing valuation issues. This decision aimed to resolve differing interpretations due to the final order&#039;s lack of specific findings on fine and penalty, ensuring fairness in the dispute&#039;s resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:58:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 570 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123949</link>
      <description>The Tribunal clarified that the appellant must pay a reduced fine of Rs. 8,00,000/- and a penalty of Rs. 2,00,000/- for violating import policy, despite successfully appealing valuation issues. This decision aimed to resolve differing interpretations due to the final order&#039;s lack of specific findings on fine and penalty, ensuring fairness in the dispute&#039;s resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>