https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123945 The CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals against multiple parties due to a delay in filing separate appeals against each individual, as required when the order pertained to more than one person. The Revenue's attempt to justify the delay by citing precedents was deemed insufficient, leading to the rejection of the applications for condonation of delay and the subsequent dismissal of the appeals as time-barred. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of adhering to procedural rules by filing separate appeals against each party involved and underscores the importance of providing adequate grounds for condonation of delay to avoid dismissal of appeals. en-us Wed, 28 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123945 The CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals against multiple parties due to a delay in filing separate appeals against each individual, as required when the order pertained to more than one person. The Revenue's attempt to justify the delay by citing precedents was deemed insufficient, leading to the rejection of the applications for condonation of delay and the subsequent dismissal of the appeals as time-barred. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of adhering to procedural rules by filing separate appeals against each party involved and underscores the importance of providing adequate grounds for condonation of delay to avoid dismissal of appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123945