<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 565 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123944</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant, a manufacturer of plastic polyethylene film/sheets, to pre-deposit sums towards Central Excise duty as exemption under Notification No. 3/2004 was not applicable. The appellant&#039;s argument that the plastic polyethylene film/sheets qualified as items of machinery required for setting up water supply plants under the notification was rejected. The Tribunal emphasized strict interpretation of exemption notifications, ruling that the plastic polyethylene film/sheets did not meet the criteria for exemption. The appellant was instructed to deposit the duty demand within a specified timeframe based on the analysis of relevant case law and the notification&#039;s language.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:44:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 565 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123944</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant, a manufacturer of plastic polyethylene film/sheets, to pre-deposit sums towards Central Excise duty as exemption under Notification No. 3/2004 was not applicable. The appellant&#039;s argument that the plastic polyethylene film/sheets qualified as items of machinery required for setting up water supply plants under the notification was rejected. The Tribunal emphasized strict interpretation of exemption notifications, ruling that the plastic polyethylene film/sheets did not meet the criteria for exemption. The appellant was instructed to deposit the duty demand within a specified timeframe based on the analysis of relevant case law and the notification&#039;s language.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>