https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123934 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner's order directing the confiscation of goods under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, along with the redemption fine and penalty imposed under Section 112(a). The Tribunal found that the appellant did not intentionally misdeclare the imported goods as texturised fabric, emphasizing the reliance on documents from foreign suppliers and the lack of deliberate misrepresentation. The decision highlighted the appellant's genuine intent to clear the consignment promptly and avoid financial losses, ultimately granting relief in the appeal. en-us Mon, 19 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123934 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner's order directing the confiscation of goods under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, along with the redemption fine and penalty imposed under Section 112(a). The Tribunal found that the appellant did not intentionally misdeclare the imported goods as texturised fabric, emphasizing the reliance on documents from foreign suppliers and the lack of deliberate misrepresentation. The decision highlighted the appellant's genuine intent to clear the consignment promptly and avoid financial losses, ultimately granting relief in the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 19 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123934