<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 548 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123927</link>
    <description>Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. excludes clearances of goods bearing another person&#039;s brand name from the aggregate value of clearances for small scale exemption purposes. Applying that condition, the CESTAT found a strong prima facie case that the exemption could not be denied merely because the assessee had also cleared branded goods on payment of duty and taken credit on inputs used in those goods. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties was granted and the stay petitions were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 11:01:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 548 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123927</link>
      <description>Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. excludes clearances of goods bearing another person&#039;s brand name from the aggregate value of clearances for small scale exemption purposes. Applying that condition, the CESTAT found a strong prima facie case that the exemption could not be denied merely because the assessee had also cleared branded goods on payment of duty and taken credit on inputs used in those goods. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties was granted and the stay petitions were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>