<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 741 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123921</link>
    <description>An appealable adjudication order fixing annual capacity under Section 3A attains finality if not challenged by statutory appeal, and its correctness cannot later be reopened indirectly in a refund proceeding. The assessee had accepted the capacity determination and paid duty accordingly, so the refund claim was not maintainable insofar as it sought to assail that unchallenged order. The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 741 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123921</link>
      <description>An appealable adjudication order fixing annual capacity under Section 3A attains finality if not challenged by statutory appeal, and its correctness cannot later be reopened indirectly in a refund proceeding. The assessee had accepted the capacity determination and paid duty accordingly, so the refund claim was not maintainable insofar as it sought to assail that unchallenged order. The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>