<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 620 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123914</link>
    <description>Paper qualifies as newsprint under Chapter 48 only if it is intended for printing newspapers. On the facts, the consignments were supplied to education boards and similar organisations, and there was no evidence that they were meant for newspaper printing. The goods therefore could not be treated as newsprint for tariff classification or for the related exemption claim. The Revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded, the impugned order was set aside, and the adjudication order was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 620 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123914</link>
      <description>Paper qualifies as newsprint under Chapter 48 only if it is intended for printing newspapers. On the facts, the consignments were supplied to education boards and similar organisations, and there was no evidence that they were meant for newspaper printing. The goods therefore could not be treated as newsprint for tariff classification or for the related exemption claim. The Revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded, the impugned order was set aside, and the adjudication order was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>