<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 618 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123912</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision to reject the appellant&#039;s claim for interest on redemption fine and penalty during the appeal, as they do not fall under the purview of duty as specified in Section 27 of the Customs Act. The tribunal emphasized that interest under Section 27 is applicable only to delayed refunds of duty, not redemption fine or penalty. Previous court decisions granting interest on redemption fine were based on equity, not statutory provisions, and authorities are bound by statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:20:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 618 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123912</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision to reject the appellant&#039;s claim for interest on redemption fine and penalty during the appeal, as they do not fall under the purview of duty as specified in Section 27 of the Customs Act. The tribunal emphasized that interest under Section 27 is applicable only to delayed refunds of duty, not redemption fine or penalty. Previous court decisions granting interest on redemption fine were based on equity, not statutory provisions, and authorities are bound by statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>