<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 387 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to apply a 6% interest rate, as per Notification No. 67/2003-C.E., on a refunded duty deposit of Rs. 3,41,625/-. The appellant&#039;s argument for a higher rate was dismissed, emphasizing the applicability of the specified rate under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The judgment underscores the necessity of complying with statutory provisions and notifications regarding duty deposits and interest rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:02:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 387 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to apply a 6% interest rate, as per Notification No. 67/2003-C.E., on a refunded duty deposit of Rs. 3,41,625/-. The appellant&#039;s argument for a higher rate was dismissed, emphasizing the applicability of the specified rate under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The judgment underscores the necessity of complying with statutory provisions and notifications regarding duty deposits and interest rates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>