<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 614 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123867</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of charges reimbursed by a subsidiary company as additional consideration for advertising and sales promotion expenses. Citing principles established by the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court, the Tribunal found no evidence of additional consideration flowing back to the appellant, aligning the case with previous decisions. The appeal was dismissed on 27-8-2007, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:42:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 614 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123867</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of charges reimbursed by a subsidiary company as additional consideration for advertising and sales promotion expenses. Citing principles established by the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court, the Tribunal found no evidence of additional consideration flowing back to the appellant, aligning the case with previous decisions. The appeal was dismissed on 27-8-2007, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>