<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 611 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123864</link>
    <description>Duty demand and penalties based only on raw material stock shortages could not be sustained where material issue notes explained the discrepancy and the shortage remained negligible within the permissible tolerance range. In the absence of any independent evidence of clandestine removal or clearance, mere stock variation was insufficient to uphold the demand. The duty and penalties were therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:34:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 611 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123864</link>
      <description>Duty demand and penalties based only on raw material stock shortages could not be sustained where material issue notes explained the discrepancy and the shortage remained negligible within the permissible tolerance range. In the absence of any independent evidence of clandestine removal or clearance, mere stock variation was insufficient to uphold the demand. The duty and penalties were therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>