<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 610 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123863</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal confirmed a demand of duty against the appellant for the final product and Modvat credit based on findings of clandestine removal. Despite the Commissioner upholding the duty and penalty, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s objections regarding stock verification discrepancies. Emphasizing the need for legal evidence, the Tribunal set aside the order due to lack of corroborative evidence, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:31:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 610 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123863</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal confirmed a demand of duty against the appellant for the final product and Modvat credit based on findings of clandestine removal. Despite the Commissioner upholding the duty and penalty, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s objections regarding stock verification discrepancies. Emphasizing the need for legal evidence, the Tribunal set aside the order due to lack of corroborative evidence, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>