<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 609 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123862</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing both appeals with consequential relief. The duty amount of Rs. 5,000 for goods sent to the job worker was confirmed, but the penalty imposed on the manufacturer was set aside. The delayed show cause notice and lack of substantial evidence led to the decision in favor of the appellants, except for the duty demand of Rs. 5,000 against the manufacturer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 609 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123862</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing both appeals with consequential relief. The duty amount of Rs. 5,000 for goods sent to the job worker was confirmed, but the penalty imposed on the manufacturer was set aside. The delayed show cause notice and lack of substantial evidence led to the decision in favor of the appellants, except for the duty demand of Rs. 5,000 against the manufacturer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>