<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 553 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123858</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision in favor of the appellants, a 100% EOU engaged in manufacturing grey fabrics. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the original authority&#039;s order concerning excess raw materials found at the appellant unit, emphasizing the entitlement of a 100% EOU to duty-free procurement of raw materials. The Tribunal concurred with the Commissioner&#039;s findings, highlighting the lack of evidence of illicit procurement or intent to conceal, and accepted the appellant&#039;s explanation of an accounting error for the excess raw materials, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:59:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 553 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123858</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision in favor of the appellants, a 100% EOU engaged in manufacturing grey fabrics. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the original authority&#039;s order concerning excess raw materials found at the appellant unit, emphasizing the entitlement of a 100% EOU to duty-free procurement of raw materials. The Tribunal concurred with the Commissioner&#039;s findings, highlighting the lack of evidence of illicit procurement or intent to conceal, and accepted the appellant&#039;s explanation of an accounting error for the excess raw materials, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>