<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 538 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123852</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision regarding the confiscation of unaccounted stock in the shop premises and dropping the duty demand for goods in the factory premises. The judgment emphasized the lack of evidence supporting clandestine removal of goods from the factory and dismissed the Department&#039;s arguments against the Commissioner (Appeals) order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:27:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 538 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123852</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision regarding the confiscation of unaccounted stock in the shop premises and dropping the duty demand for goods in the factory premises. The judgment emphasized the lack of evidence supporting clandestine removal of goods from the factory and dismissed the Department&#039;s arguments against the Commissioner (Appeals) order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>