https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123844 The duty demand against the manufacturers of Texurised Yarn for alleged clandestine removal based on discrepancies between the balance sheet and RG-1 register figures for the year 1995-96 was deemed unjustified. The appellants successfully argued that the Revenue failed to provide sufficient evidence beyond mere comparisons of figures to establish clandestine removal. As a result, the duty demand and penalties imposed were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants. en-us Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:55:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123844 The duty demand against the manufacturers of Texurised Yarn for alleged clandestine removal based on discrepancies between the balance sheet and RG-1 register figures for the year 1995-96 was deemed unjustified. The appellants successfully argued that the Revenue failed to provide sufficient evidence beyond mere comparisons of figures to establish clandestine removal. As a result, the duty demand and penalties imposed were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123844