<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 655 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123838</link>
    <description>Exemption under a conditional notification cannot be denied on mere presumptions where the factual record shows compliance with the prescribed requirement of maintaining separate accounts or records. The adjudicating authority had found, on the evidence, that separate production records for exempted goods were maintained and that the Board&#039;s circular requirement was satisfied. The appellate reversal, based on assumptions about non-maintenance of books and possible credit use for exempt clearances, did not displace that factual finding. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee remained entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 30/2004-C.E., with restoration of the dropped demand and consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:47:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 655 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123838</link>
      <description>Exemption under a conditional notification cannot be denied on mere presumptions where the factual record shows compliance with the prescribed requirement of maintaining separate accounts or records. The adjudicating authority had found, on the evidence, that separate production records for exempted goods were maintained and that the Board&#039;s circular requirement was satisfied. The appellate reversal, based on assumptions about non-maintenance of books and possible credit use for exempt clearances, did not displace that factual finding. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee remained entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 30/2004-C.E., with restoration of the dropped demand and consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>