https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123834 Duty demand was not contested, but penalty was examined on whether breach of the conditions in Exemption Notification No. 5/98-C.E. justified penal action. The Tribunal treated the dispute as one of legal interpretation over fulfilment of the notification condition, noted that the point had already been settled in the relied-upon matter, and held that the controversy did not warrant penal consequences. Penalty was therefore set aside, while the duty demand was confirmed. en-us Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:25:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123834 Duty demand was not contested, but penalty was examined on whether breach of the conditions in Exemption Notification No. 5/98-C.E. justified penal action. The Tribunal treated the dispute as one of legal interpretation over fulfilment of the notification condition, noted that the point had already been settled in the relied-upon matter, and held that the controversy did not warrant penal consequences. Penalty was therefore set aside, while the duty demand was confirmed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123834