<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 650 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. It emphasized the importance of complying with Section 11AB regarding interest payment for short payment of duty, even when the underpayment is rectified upon discovery. The judgment highlighted the statutory requirement for interest payment in cases of incorrect duty computation, affirming the original authority&#039;s order based on Section 11AB provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:22:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 650 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. It emphasized the importance of complying with Section 11AB regarding interest payment for short payment of duty, even when the underpayment is rectified upon discovery. The judgment highlighted the statutory requirement for interest payment in cases of incorrect duty computation, affirming the original authority&#039;s order based on Section 11AB provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>