<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 409 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123808</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of the benefit of notification and confirmation of customs duty due to the withdrawal of the essentiality certificate. However, it found that confiscation of goods and penalty were not justified as the goods were imported with a valid certificate. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:46:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 409 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123808</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of the benefit of notification and confirmation of customs duty due to the withdrawal of the essentiality certificate. However, it found that confiscation of goods and penalty were not justified as the goods were imported with a valid certificate. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>