<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 540 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123802</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the valuation of &#039;Bone Meat Meal&#039; cleared to DTA should be under Section 14 of the Customs Act, not Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. The appellant&#039;s argument that duty on DTA clearances for EOUs should be calculated as per the Customs Act was accepted, leading to the waiver of duty deposit and penalty, with recovery stayed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:15:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 540 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123802</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the valuation of &#039;Bone Meat Meal&#039; cleared to DTA should be under Section 14 of the Customs Act, not Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. The appellant&#039;s argument that duty on DTA clearances for EOUs should be calculated as per the Customs Act was accepted, leading to the waiver of duty deposit and penalty, with recovery stayed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>