<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 537 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123799</link>
    <description>The appellate limitation under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962 controls the time for filing customs appeals, and a contrary period mentioned in the adjudication order&#039;s preamble cannot override the statute. The cited precedent held that the appellate authority has no power to condone delay beyond the permissible statutory limit. As the appeal was filed after the prescribed period, the delay could not be condoned and the appeal was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 537 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123799</link>
      <description>The appellate limitation under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962 controls the time for filing customs appeals, and a contrary period mentioned in the adjudication order&#039;s preamble cannot override the statute. The cited precedent held that the appellate authority has no power to condone delay beyond the permissible statutory limit. As the appeal was filed after the prescribed period, the delay could not be condoned and the appeal was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>