<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 777 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123771</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit is allowable where duty has actually been paid and is reflected in valid duty-paying documents, even if a notification reducing the duty rate operated on the same day as clearance. The recipient is entitled to rely on invoices showing duty paid at the higher rate, and credit cannot be denied merely because the rate was later or simultaneously reduced. On this reasoning, the order disallowing credit was set aside and the appeals succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:18:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 777 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123771</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit is allowable where duty has actually been paid and is reflected in valid duty-paying documents, even if a notification reducing the duty rate operated on the same day as clearance. The recipient is entitled to rely on invoices showing duty paid at the higher rate, and credit cannot be denied merely because the rate was later or simultaneously reduced. On this reasoning, the order disallowing credit was set aside and the appeals succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>