<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 772 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification, emphasizing its limited authority to rectify mistakes on record and distinguishing between rectification and review of orders. The decision stressed the requirement for mistakes to be clear and not open to debate to justify rectification, citing relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:57:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 772 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification, emphasizing its limited authority to rectify mistakes on record and distinguishing between rectification and review of orders. The decision stressed the requirement for mistakes to be clear and not open to debate to justify rectification, citing relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>