<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 537 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123754</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the application for rectification of mistake, citing a legislative amendment clarifying duty obligations post a Supreme Court judgment. The Tribunal reasoned that its decision aligned with the amended law, emphasizing the lack of error and the availability of appellate remedies. The decision underscored the importance of legal developments and their impact on case outcomes, ultimately upholding the original order in light of the legislative changes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:13:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 537 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123754</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the application for rectification of mistake, citing a legislative amendment clarifying duty obligations post a Supreme Court judgment. The Tribunal reasoned that its decision aligned with the amended law, emphasizing the lack of error and the availability of appellate remedies. The decision underscored the importance of legal developments and their impact on case outcomes, ultimately upholding the original order in light of the legislative changes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>