<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 457 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123721</link>
    <description>Retrospective amendment under the Central Excise framework was treated as validating rules that mandate lapsing and non-utilisation of unutilised Modvat credit under the compounded levy scheme, so the appellants could not claim a prima facie right to use that credit after the special levy regime ended. Prior decisions relied on to support utilisation were considered unavailable in light of the amended statutory position. On that basis, no complete waiver of pre-deposit was granted, and only a partial pre-deposit was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:42:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 457 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123721</link>
      <description>Retrospective amendment under the Central Excise framework was treated as validating rules that mandate lapsing and non-utilisation of unutilised Modvat credit under the compounded levy scheme, so the appellants could not claim a prima facie right to use that credit after the special levy regime ended. Prior decisions relied on to support utilisation were considered unavailable in light of the amended statutory position. On that basis, no complete waiver of pre-deposit was granted, and only a partial pre-deposit was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>