https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123720 Prima facie conflict on Cenvat credit admissibility for steel items used in construction, including whether such goods qualify as capital goods or inputs, justified interim protection. The Tribunal noted contrary views on similar items, and that one issue was already before a Larger Bench while another had been prima facie considered in favour of the appellant in its own case. On that basis, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with and recovery was stayed pending final resolution of the credit controversy. en-us Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2017 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123720 Prima facie conflict on Cenvat credit admissibility for steel items used in construction, including whether such goods qualify as capital goods or inputs, justified interim protection. The Tribunal noted contrary views on similar items, and that one issue was already before a Larger Bench while another had been prima facie considered in favour of the appellant in its own case. On that basis, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with and recovery was stayed pending final resolution of the credit controversy. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123720