<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 396 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123716</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application, upholding the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred. The Tribunal ruled that the dispatch of the adjudication order by Speed Post constituted valid service under the law, in line with established judicial precedents. The decision was made on 11-6-2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 09:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 396 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123716</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application, upholding the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred. The Tribunal ruled that the dispatch of the adjudication order by Speed Post constituted valid service under the law, in line with established judicial precedents. The decision was made on 11-6-2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>