https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123714 An application seeking release of seized goods or a direction for early adjudication was held not maintainable before CESTAT where the show cause notice had not yet been adjudicated by the Commissioner of Customs. The Tribunal noted that the goods had been seized and a deposit had been made for their release, but the pending adjudication meant the request could not be entertained at that stage. The precedent relied on for inherent powers was distinguished because it involved a different procedural context, namely an existing appeal and stay order. en-us Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:03:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123714 An application seeking release of seized goods or a direction for early adjudication was held not maintainable before CESTAT where the show cause notice had not yet been adjudicated by the Commissioner of Customs. The Tribunal noted that the goods had been seized and a deposit had been made for their release, but the pending adjudication meant the request could not be entertained at that stage. The precedent relied on for inherent powers was distinguished because it involved a different procedural context, namely an existing appeal and stay order. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123714