<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 599 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123713</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the order of confiscation, fine, and penalty imposed on the appellants for misdeclaration of goods, as it was determined that the receipt of a new calibrator with a different serial number was a genuine mistake by the manufacturer and not intentional misdeclaration by the importer. The tribunal accepted the importer&#039;s explanation and allowed the appeal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and Additional Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 599 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123713</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the order of confiscation, fine, and penalty imposed on the appellants for misdeclaration of goods, as it was determined that the receipt of a new calibrator with a different serial number was a genuine mistake by the manufacturer and not intentional misdeclaration by the importer. The tribunal accepted the importer&#039;s explanation and allowed the appeal, overturning the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and Additional Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>