https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123703 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the remand order by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeal) concerning alleged clandestine removal of iron and steel products. The Tribunal found that the Revenue failed to provide substantial contradictory evidence to challenge the lower authority's findings. Despite the remand, the Revenue did not present crucial corroboration regarding the transportation and buyers of the products. The Tribunal emphasized that success in defense should not solely depend on undermining the opposing party without discharging the burden of proof, leading to the rejection of the stay application and the appeal. en-us Mon, 26 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:04:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123703 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the remand order by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeal) concerning alleged clandestine removal of iron and steel products. The Tribunal found that the Revenue failed to provide substantial contradictory evidence to challenge the lower authority's findings. Despite the remand, the Revenue did not present crucial corroboration regarding the transportation and buyers of the products. The Tribunal emphasized that success in defense should not solely depend on undermining the opposing party without discharging the burden of proof, leading to the rejection of the stay application and the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123703